How wild animals die: what we know so far

Fundamental takeaways

  • Many studies have investigated the causes of death of adult mammals and birds, but there is a lack of data on the deaths of juvenile animals, also as fish and insects.
  • Large, developed animals are more likely to be killed by humans than by any other crusade. Small-bodied animals and juveniles are more than susceptible to predation by other wild fauna.
  • Technological improvements in underwater monitoring will meliorate our understanding of wild fish mortality.
  • Insects frequently dice in very different means from larger animals. Most of what we know most insects' deaths comes from agricultural pest control research.
  • Populations need to be studied under a range of weather to predict how their cause-specific bloodshed rates might change nether unlike scenarios.

Introduction

Previously, I wrote about approaches to studying wild animals' causes of death, with the goal of making work in this field maximally useful for agreement wild animate being welfare. Cause of death has not received sufficient research attention relative to its significance to wild animate being welfare. The overwhelming majority of the research that does exist is focused on land-dwelling mammals and birds, and primarily on cases where understanding what animals are dying from is instrumental to preventing the extinction of their species. Hither, I will requite an overview of what research in this field has taught us so far well-nigh how wild animals die and highlight gaps that seem specially important for welfare biology.

Cause of death in wild terrestrial vertebrates

Collins and Kays (2011) conducted the first systematic review of crusade-specific mortality rates in mammals, selecting simply studies that used small radio trackers to monitor animals and certificate their deaths in a timely fashion. They too limited their analysis to adult animals, due to a serious lack of data on juvenile mortality causes. This review found that, overall, predation was the almost mutual cause of expiry for pocket-sized-bodied mammals, while human-acquired deaths, including hunting and vehicle standoff, were the nigh mutual causes of death in larger mammals.

In 2019, Loma et al. expanded on this review with a vast amount of new data, including data from juveniles and not-mammalian vertebrates. They establish that natural causes of expiry (predation, disease, starvation), particularly predation, were common amidst juvenile animals irrespective of their species' typical adult body size. For mammals and reptiles, predation was roughly twice as frequent in juveniles equally in adults, with predation accounting for more than than 95% of documented deaths of juvenile reptiles (Effigy 1). Birds, on the other hand, exhibited very similar cause-specific bloodshed rates between juvenile and adult age classes.

The authors notation that their dataset probably nevertheless greatly underestimates natural causes of expiry, because that these deaths are often harder to detect. Although smaller animals showroom the highest natural mortality rates, they are harder to monitor. Research to engagement has also focused on populations that come into conflict with or are used by humans.  These factors combine to brand the most numerous deaths in the wild the least understood.

Figure 1

Figure i

Cause-specific mortality rates separated by historic period and taxonomic class. Adjusted from Loma et al. (2019).

Hill et al. provide an excellent summary of mortality causes, only many of these categories — especially predation, accident and disease — encompass a huge caste of variation in experience. For example, xviii% of New Zealand body of water lions die from tuberculosis, while 24% die as a event of violence from other sea lions (Lenting et al. 2019). Similarly, approximately half of American black bears die as cubs, often every bit a event of attacks by older male person bears (LeCount 1987). In their report area of northern Pennsylvania, Alt (1984) estimated that v% of cubs drowned in their wintertime dens as a result of wink flooding. This was 3-5 times more likely to occur when dens were made in root cavities or excavated soil. Juvenile bears too frequently die from disease (eastward.g. Chomel et al. 1998). For example, a grizzly cub suffering from canine hepatitis died live on camera in Katmai National Park beside their bewildered female parent and siblings. Welfare interventions will need to account for all this variation in private wild animals' experiences of decease.

Much of the data on birds' deaths comes from urban wild fauna hospitals, where traumatic injury is oftentimes the apparent leading cause of death among developed birds, while disease and malnutrition is responsible for the majority of juvenile deaths (eastward.thousand. Stenkat et al. 2013). However, these statistics are certain to be biased by the kinds of birds and causes of death that people are about likely to come into contact with. For example, although many traumatic injuries are owing to domestic cats, birds attacked past predatory raptors are rarely admitted (c.f. Palma et al. 2006). Studies of radio-tagged wild birds report predation and hunting every bit the leading causes of death (Hill et al. 2019). Some disease mortality can besides be linked to hunting practices, as the importation of birds to stock hunting grounds tin contribute to outbreaks (Buenestado 2009). Migratory birds present a special claiming for researchers, since many of their deaths occur in transit over long distances, where it may exist incommunicable to recover their corpses. For example, out of 51 likely deaths amidst satellite-tracked migratory raptors, Klaasen et al. (2014) were only able to confirm 10, amongst which the leading causes of death were collision with man-made structures and exhaustion during migration.

The progress made in the last decade of cause-specific mortality research is encouraging, just there is much more to be learned, especially about more than numerous, smaller-bodied animals. Piffling is known well-nigh the causes of death among prairie dogs, for example, except that predation is common and plague occasionally wipes out unabridged colonies (Crosby and Graham 1986; Stapp et al. 2004). Studies of wild reptiles, especially snakes and turtles, consistently indicate road traffic accidents as a leading cause of death (e.g. Himes et al. 2002), although about juveniles are killed past predators (e.g. Butler and Sowell 1996). These gaps in our knowledge of wild animal mortality seem probable to be filled as radio tracking devices are made smaller, lighter and more resilient over the next decade (Kays et al. 2015).

Crusade of death in wild fish

Among vertebrates, the most neglected group in the current body of cause-specific mortality inquiry is wild fish. Of the papers that practise affect causes of death in wild fish, many are example reports focusing on the risks of disease outbreaks to human health or the fishing manufacture. Instance reports can be valuable for demonstrating the presence of specific risks that some number of fish do dice from (Krkošek 2017). For example, Sterud et al. (2007) detected an outbreak of the parasite Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae in an Atlantic salmon population that appeared to exist their most common cause of death during the report menstruation. This parasite is probably in constant circulation amongst the fish, and outbreaks take been documented in many other populations, just it is impossible to say whether these results are a representative snapshot of the parasite's outcome on mortality or what alternative causes of death occur in the population.

Most effective studies of terrestrial animals' cause of death rely on recovering the corpses of tagged individuals, as discussed in my previous post. However, this is clearly more than challenging to do with fish. Radio signals for tracking individuals are relatively ineffective underwater, and corpses are much less probable to be recovered (c.f. Benelli and Pozzebon 2013). Several studies have cleverly taken advantage of avian predators naturally retrieving radio-tagged fish from the water and depositing their eaten corpses on shore. For example, Koed et al. (2006) estimated that 39% and 12% of juvenile salmon and brown trout, respectively, were preyed upon by cormorants in the estuary where their study was prepare. Approximately a further x% of salmon and trout were killed by cormorants in the bordering river, while 3-6% were preyed upon by pike, a predatory fish. A similar report past Dieperink et al. (2001) recorded that 65% of juvenile trout were eaten by cormorants and herons while migrating downstream to the Baltic Body of water. Fritts and Pearsons (2004) used another predator-based approach to quantify predation, analyzing the breadbasket contents of smallmouth bass to gauge their annual consumption of salmon. Taken at face up value, their results suggested that smallmouth bass accounted for only around iv% of salmon mortality in this system, though the authors noted that this was probably an underestimate. Despite the special challenges involved in recovering the corpses of wild fish, it is at least possible to study the touch on of specific predators on fish populations.

Technological progress is proving especially important for studying cause of expiry in the marine environment. In one recent study, fish were implanted with acoustic transmitters that enabled the researchers to detect predation events occurring within range of their underwater receiver array (Weinz et al. 2020). They inferred that approximately one third of tagged fish were preyed upon over the four months following their release. Several factors could be confounding this result, in both directions. For ane, the invasive procedure required to implant the fish with acoustic transmitters could have made these particular fish more than susceptible to predation than boilerplate. This would be consistent with other studies showing that fish caught and released are more than vulnerable due to physical injuries or stress (e.m. Raby et al. 2013). On the other mitt, some predation events were likely missed considering they occurred out of range of the audio-visual array. As the range of underwater tracking improves and the size of transmitting devices decreases so every bit to crusade less harm to the tagged individuals, we should wait to see much more data on the lives and deaths of fish and other marine animals.

Cause of decease in insects

Insects are among the nearly numerous and various animals, but too the smallest. Their diversity and size makes them particularly hard to monitor on an private level. At the same time, some insect species are viewed every bit pests, and and so there is commercial interest in understanding their natural causes of death to devise more effective management strategies (Roux and Baumgärtner 1998). This has motivated a handful of studies reviewing the causes of death of agriculturally relevant insects (Table 1).

Some of these studies use a combination of field observations and population modeling to gauge by how much the population's overall bloodshed rate would be reduced if a given cause of death could be eliminated. For case, if predators unduly target weak or sick prey, then even if many individuals ultimately die from predation, eliminating their predators may have only a pocket-size effect on the overall mortality rate because the same individuals who are vulnerable to predation are also vulnerable to dying soon from illness or starvation.

Table 1

Tabular array 1

Summarized results from eight studies on cause-specific bloodshed in vi insect species from a pest management context.

Determining the significance of competing mortality risks

Futurity interventions seeking to improve wild animal welfare should account for how actions to protect animals from specific causes of decease could influence population sizes, lifespans, and culling causes of death. Compensatory mortality, where mortality due to a certain cause is replaced by mortality due to another cause when the commencement is removed, has been noted in many diverse species and ecosystems. For case, Hostetter et al. (2012) reported that cormorants along the Columbia River in Oregon selectively predate poorer-condition juvenile steelhead salmon en route to the sea. Had they not been killed by cormorants, these aforementioned individuals would probable have been among the kickoff to succumb to harsh weather and contest during their first winter in the body of water (Hurst 2007). Similarly, in a classic written report on mule deer, Bartmann et al. (1992) plant that removal of coyotes over winter reduced the charge per unit of mule deer deaths by predation, merely did not increment their overall survival rates, as the researchers observed increased mortality due to starvation. Diseased mule deer are also selectively preyed upon by mountain lions (e.yard. Krumm et al. 2009), which suggests that some of this predator-caused mortality is compensatory.

On the other manus, some crusade-specific mortality really is irreplaceable. Achhami et al. (2020) demonstrated this for establish chemical defenses against wheat stalk sawflies, while Cooley et al. (2009) showed that other causes of decease are not reduced in populations of mountain lions hunted by humans. Bergman et al. (2015) proposed that the degree to which mortality due to a particular crusade is compensatory depends on ecological context. For example, if chronic affliction made animals less effective at competing for food in a dumbo population, death by starvation may occur get-go and compensate for some disease-related mortality in this hypothetical population. If nutrient afterwards became more accessible, we might discover an credible increase in bloodshed acquired by diseases that are at present able to run their grade. In add-on to studying mortality dynamics in a snapshot of a population's nowadays conditions, inquiry should model how mortality risks compete under different conditions (Siler 1979) (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2

Three hypothetical scenarios for the dynamics of mortality due to predation on a casualty population. In all scenarios, baseline mortality in the absence of predators is 50 individuals per twelvemonth. If predator-induced mortality is completely condiment (imperial diamonds), 10 more animals dying to predation increases total mortality past ten. If predation is completely compensatory (blue squares), total mortality stays constant despite an increased number of deaths past predation; instead, there are commensurately fewer deaths by other causes. In nearly cases, bloodshed due to a given cause is likely to be partially compensatory (green circles), lying somewhere between these two extremes. In this model, low rates of predation are mostly compensatory, perhaps removing sometime or sick individuals from the population. As the intensity of predation increases, a larger proportion of healthy animals are killed and so predation mortality becomes increasingly additive.

Conclusions

A relatively comprehensive snapshot of cause of decease in the wild is emerging for terrestrial mammals, birds, and reptiles, cheers to mainstream research in ecology and conservation (Hill et al. 2019). For instance, we can encounter that predation is the leading natural cause of death, especially in juveniles (Figure 1). However, this business relationship is even so likely to be heavily biased, since most studies focus on adults and big-bodied species. The focus on large animals could be inflating the number of deaths caused by hunting rather than vehicle collisions, for case, given that accidents involving pocket-size animals often get unreported (Sáenz-de-Santa-María and Tellería 2015). More than enquiry on juveniles and small mammals is needed (Table 2). We are too at the phase of considering interventions to improve the welfare of some wild mammals and birds, ranging from dove fertility control to reducing feral cat predation. To brand these interventions as effective as possible, it would be valuable to understand the replaceability of different sources of mortality.

Table 2

Table 2

Enquiry gaps and proposed priorities by taxon.

Fish and juvenile amphibians are however seriously lacking in information on crusade-specific bloodshed, peculiarly relating to juveniles. Inquiry on both of these groups is challenged by the fact that they spend some or all of their lives underwater, but biologging technologies — including pop-upwardly satellite archival tags (PSATs) (Tolentino et al. 2017) and acoustic telemetry (Weinz et al. 2020) — could enable more research on crusade of death in aquatic environments, particularly related to predation.

A surprising amount is known most crusade-specific mortality in insects regarded equally agronomical pests (Tabular array one). Still, very petty research has been done on the deaths of insects with less agronomical relevance. From the existing inquiry, it is clear that insects face up challenges that would surprise united states of america. For example, Asiimwe et al. (2006) found that many whiteflies died as a result of poorly understood developmental abnormalities, such every bit failure to complete metamorphosis. Drowning during rainy weather was one of the foremost causes of expiry amongst the moths of Pereira et al. (2007), and plant chemic defenses were responsible for a majority of the deaths of wheat stem sawflies monitored by Acchami et al. (2020).

As many challenges every bit we know that animals face in the wild, some may yet be masked past the urgent threats they face from humans through hunting, fishing, extermination, and contest for resource. Humans should go out more space for wildlife, and endeavour non to brand their existence harder than it already is, but we should also be willing to go further. Learning more than about crusade-specific mortality in different populations and environmental contexts can inform plans for the well-nigh constructive deportment to improve wild fauna welfare.

References

  1. Achhami, Buddhi B., Robert One thousand. D. Peterson, Jamie D. Sherman, Gadi V. P. Reddy, and David K. Weaver. 2020. 'Multiple Decrement Life Tables of Cephus Cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) across a Set of Barley Cultivars: The Importance of Plant Defense versus Cannibalism'. PLOS ONE 15 (ix): e0238527. https://doi.org/x.1371/journal.pone.0238527.

  2. Andis, K. D., and C. 50. Meek. 1985. 'Mortality and Survival Patterns for the Immature Stages of Psorophora Columbiae'. Journal of the American Mosquito Command Association ane (3): 357–62.

  3. Asiimwe, P., J. S. Ecaat, M. Otim, D. Gerling, S. Kyamanywa, and J. P. Legg. 2007. 'Life-Table Analysis of Mortality Factors Affecting Populations of Bemisia Tabaci on Cassava in Uganda'. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 122 (1): 37–44. https://doi.org/ten.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00487.10.

  4. Bartmann, Richard Grand., Gary C. White, and Len H. Carpenter. 1992. 'Compensatory Bloodshed in a Colorado Mule Deer Population'. Wildlife Monographs, no. 121: 3–39.

  5. Benelli, G., Pozzebon, A., & Reaz, M. B. I. 2013. 'RFID under water: Technical issues and applications' (pp. 379-395). Rijeka: InTech. https://doi.org/x.5772/53934.

  6. Bergman, Eric J., Paul F. Doherty, Gary C. White, and A. Andrew Holland. 2015. 'Density Dependence in Mule Deer: A Review of Evidence'. Wild animals Biology 21 (i): xviii–29. https://doi.org/x.2981/wlb.00012.

  7. Buenestado, F. J., Ferreras, P., BLANCO‐AGUIAR, J. A., Tortosa, F. S., & Villafuerte, R. 2009. 'Survival and causes of mortality amidst wild Red‐legged Partridges Alectoris rufa in southern Kingdom of spain: implications for conservation'. Ibis 151 (4): 720-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00952.10.

  8. Butler, J. A., & Sowell, South. 1996. 'Survivorship and predation of hatchling and yearling gopher tortoises, Gopherus polyphemus'. Journal of Herpetology 30 (three): 455-458. https://doi.org/x.2307/1565195.

  9. Chomel, B.B., R.Due west. Kasten, G. Chappuis, G. Soulier, and Y. Kikuchi. 1998. 'Serological Survey of Selected Canine Viral Pathogens and Zoonoses in Grizzly Bears (Ursus Arctos Horribilis) and Black Bears (Ursus Americanus) from Alaska: -EN- -FR- -ES-'. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE 17 (three): 756–66. https://doi.org/ten.20506/rst.17.3.1134.

  10. Collins, C., and R. Kays. 2011. 'Causes of Bloodshed in North American Populations of Large and Medium-Sized Mammals'. Animal Conservation 14 (5): 474–83. https://doi.org/x.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00458.x.

  11. Cooley, Hilary S., Robert B. Wielgus, Gary Grand. Koehler, Hugh Southward. Robinson, and Benjamin T. Maletzke. 2009. 'Does Hunting Regulate Cougar Populations? A Test of the Compensatory Mortality Hypothesis'. Ecology 90 (10): 2913–21. https://doi.org/x.1890/08-1805.one.

  12. Crosby, Lyle A., and Randy Graham. 1986. 'Population Dynamics and Expansion Rates of Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs'. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 12 (12). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23t218h1.

  13. Dieperink, C., S. Pedersen, and 1000. I. Pedersen. 2001. 'Estuarine Predation on Radiotagged Wild and Domesticated Body of water Trout (Salmo Trutta L.) Smolts'. Environmental of Freshwater Fish 10 (3): 177–83. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0633.2001.100307.x.

  14. Fritts, Anthony L., and Todd Northward. Pearsons. 2004. 'Smallmouth Bass Predation on Hatchery and Wild Salmonids in the Yakima River, Washington'. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133 (4): 880–95. https://doi.org/10.1577/T03-003.1.

  15. Loma, Jacob E., Travis 50. DeVault, and Jerrold L. Belant. 2019. 'Cause-Specific Mortality of the World'south Terrestrial Vertebrates'. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28 (5): 680–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12881.

  16. Himes, J. G., Hardy, L. Grand., Rudolph, D. C., & Burgdorf, Southward. J. 2002. 'Growth rates and mortality of the Louisiana pine ophidian (Pituophis ruthveni)'. Periodical of Herpetology 36 (4): 683-687. https://doi.org/ten.2307/1565941.

  17. Hostetter, Nathan J., Allen F. Evans, Daniel D. Roby, and Ken Collis. 2012. 'Susceptibility of Juvenile Steelhead to Avian Predation: The Influence of Private Fish Characteristics and River Atmospheric condition'. Transactions of the American Fisheries Gild 141 (6): 1586–99. https://doi.org/x.1080/00028487.2012.716011.

  18. Hurst, T. P. 2007. 'Causes and Consequences of Wintertime Mortality in Fishes'. Periodical of Fish Biology 71 (2): 315–45. https://doi.org/ten.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01596.10.

  19. Jones, Davy. 1982. 'Predators and Parasites of Temporary Row Ingather Pests: Agents of Irreplaceable Mortality or Scavengers Acting Prior to Other Bloodshed Factors?' Entomophaga 27 (3): 245–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374809.

  20. Karut, K., and Due south. Due east. Naranjo. 2009. 'Mortality Factors Affecting Bemisia Tabaci Populations on Cotton in Turkey'. Journal of Applied Entomology 133 (5): 367–74. https://doi.org/x.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01369.x.

  21. Kays, Roland, Margaret C. Crofoot, Walter Jetz, and Martin Wikelski. 2015. 'Terrestrial Animate being Tracking as an Middle on Life and Planet'. Science 348 (6240). https://doi.org/10.1126/scientific discipline.aaa2478.

  22. Klaassen, R. H., Hake, Thou., Strandberg, R., Koks, B. J., Trierweiler, C., Exo, G. Yard., ... & Alerstam, T. 2014. 'When and where does bloodshed occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long‐term satellite tracking of raptors'. Journal of Animal Ecology 83 (1): 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12135.

  23. Koed, Anders, Henrik Baktoft, and Brian Daniel Bak. 2006. 'Causes of Mortality of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) and Chocolate-brown Trout (Salmo Trutta) Smolts in a Restored River and Its Estuary'. River Research and Applications 22 (1): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.894.

  24. Krkošek, Martin. 2017. 'Population Biology of Infectious Diseases Shared by Wild and Farmed Fish1'. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, January. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0379.

  25. Krumm, Caroline Due east., Mary M. Conner, Due north. Thompson Hobbs, Don O. Hunter, and Michael W. Miller. 2010. 'Mountain Lions Prey Selectively on Prion-Infected Mule Deer'. Biological science Letters 6 (2): 209–11. https://doi.org/x.1098/rsbl.2009.0742.

  26. LeCount, Albert L. 1987. 'Causes of Black Carry Cub Bloodshed'. Bears: Their Biology and Management 7: 75–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3872610.

  27. Lenting, B., B. Gartrell, A. Kokosinska, P. J. Duignan, South. Michael, Due south. Hunter, and W. D. Roe. 2019. 'Causes of Adult Mortality in 2 Populations of New Zealand Sea Lions (Phocarctos Hookeri)'. Veterinary and Beast Science vii (June): 100057. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.vas.2019.100057.

  28. Naranjo, Steven E., and Peter C. Ellsworth. 2005. 'Mortality Dynamics and Population Regulation in Bemisia Tabaci'. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 116 (2): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00297.x.

  29. Palma, Fifty., Beja, P., Pais, K., & Cancela Da Fonseca, Fifty. 2006. 'Why practice raptors take domestic casualty? The case of Bonelli's eagles and pigeons'. Journal of Practical Environmental 43 (6): 1075-1086. https://doi.org/x.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01213.x.

  30. Pereira, E. J. G., Grand. C. Picanço, L. Bacci, A. L. B. Crespo, and R. N. C. Guedes. 2007. 'Seasonal Mortality Factors of the Coffee Leafminer, Leucoptera Coffeella'. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97 (iv): 421–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485307005202.

  31. Peterson, Robert K. D., Ryan S. Davis, Leon 1000. Higley, and Odair A. Fernandes. 2009. 'Mortality Risk in Insects'. Environmental Entomology 38 (1): two–10. https://doi.org/ten.1603/022.038.0102.

  32. Raby, Graham D., Jessica R. Packer, Andy J. Danylchuk, and Steven J. Cooke. 2014. 'The Understudied and Underappreciated Role of Predation in the Mortality of Fish Released from Angling Gears'. Fish and Fisheries xv (3): 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12033.

  33. Roux, Olivier, and Johann Baumgärtner. 1998. 'Evaluation of Mortality Factors and Take chances Assay for the Design of an Integrated Pest Management System'. Ecological Modelling 109 (i): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00035-0.

  34. Sáenz-de-Santa-María, A., & Tellería, J. L. 2015. 'Wildlife-vehicle collisions in Spain'. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61 (three): 399-406. https://doi.org/ten.1007/s10344-015-0907-7.

  35. Siler, W. 1979. 'A competing‐chance model for beast mortality'. Ecology 60 (4): 750-757. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936612.

  36. Stapp, Paul, Michael F. Antolin, and Marking Brawl. 2004. 'Patterns of Extinction in Prairie Dog Metapopulations: Plague Outbreaks Follow El Ninì Events'. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment ii (v): 235–40. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0235:POEIPD]2.0.CO;two.

  37. Stenkat, J., Krautwald-Junghanns, Grand. Due east., & Schmidt, V. 2013. 'Causes of morbidity and mortality in free-living birds in an urban surround in Federal republic of germany'. Ecohealth 10 (4): 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-013-0868-9.

  38. Sterud, Eastward, T Forseth, O Ugedal, Tt Poppe, A Jørgensen, T Bruheim, H Fjeldstad, and Ta Mo. 2007. 'Severe Mortality in Wild Atlantic Salmon Salmo Salar Due to Proliferative Kidney Disease (PKD) Caused by Tetracapsuloides Bryosalmonae (Myxozoa)'. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 77 (October): 191–98. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao01846.

  39. Tolentino, Emily R., Russell P. Howey, Lucy A. Howey, Lance K. B. Hashemite kingdom of jordan, R. Dean Grubbs, Annabelle Brooks, Sean Williams, Edward J. Brooks, and Oliver Due north. Shipley. 2017. 'Was My Science Projection Eaten? A Novel Arroyo to Validate Consumption of Marine Biologging Instruments'. Animate being Biotelemetry 5 (1): iii. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-016-0117-4.

  40. Weinz, Amy A., Jordan K. Matley, Natalie V. Klinard, Aaron T. Fisk, and Scott F. Colborne. 2020a. 'Identification of Predation Events in Wild Fish Using Novel Acoustic Transmitters'. Animal Biotelemetry 8 (1): 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-020-00215-x.

Luke Hecht

Luke is a Staff Researcher at Wild Brute Initiative. Luke is currently pursuing a PhD in evolutionary biology at Durham University, focusing on the employ of population genetics to compare the demographic histories of wild animal populations. Luke has also done research in microbiology and geology related to understanding the limits and signatures of life on Earth and potentially other planets. Luke is located in the U.k..

luke.hecht@wildanimalinitiative.org