What Are Some Of The Issues Associated With Antibiotics In Animal Feed
Public Health Rep. 2012 January-Feb; 127(1): 4–22.
A Review of Antibiotic Utilize in Food Animals: Perspective, Policy, and Potential
Timothy F. Landers
aThe Ohio State University, Higher of Nursing, Columbus, OH
Bevin Cohen
bEye for Interdisciplinary Enquiry to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance, Columbia University Schoolhouse of Nursing, New York, NY
Thomas E. Wittum
cThe Ohio State University, Department of Veterinarian Preventive Medicine, Columbus, OH
Elaine 50. Larson
bCenter for Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY
SYNOPSIS
Antibiotic use plays a major office in the emerging public health crisis of antibiotic resistance. Although the majority of antibiotic apply occurs in agronomical settings, relatively piddling attending has been paid to how antibody use in farm animals contributes to the overall problem of antibody resistance. The aim of this review is to summarize literature on the role of antibiotics in the development of resistance and its risk to human health. Nosotros searched multiple databases to identify major lines of statement supporting the role of agricultural antibody use in the evolution of resistance and to summarize existing regulatory and policy documents. Several lines of reasoning back up the conclusion that agricultural antibiotics are associated with resistance, nevertheless most public policy is based on proficient opinion and consensus. Finally, nosotros advise strategies to accost current gaps in cognition.
Antibiotic resistance is a looming public health crisis. While one time believed to exist the province of hospitals and other health-care facilities, a host of community factors are now known to promote antibiotic resistance, and community-associated resistant strains have now been implicated as the cause of many hospital-acquired infections.1 , 2 An inherent upshot of exposure to antibiotic compounds, antibody resistance arises as a result of natural selection.three Due to normal genetic variation in bacterial populations, individual organisms may carry mutations that render antibiotics ineffective, conveying a survival reward to the mutated strain. In the presence of antibiotics, advantageous mutations can also be transferred via plasmid exchange within the bacterial colony, resulting in proliferation of the resistance trait.4 The emergence of drug resistance has been observed following the introduction of each new course of antibiotics, and the threat is compounded by a slow drug development pipeline and limited investment in the discovery and development of new antibiotic agents.5 – 7
International, national, and local antibody stewardship campaigns accept been developed to encourage prudent employ of and limit unnecessary exposure to antibiotics, with the ultimate goal of preserving their effectiveness for serious and life-threatening infections.8 , 9 In practice, however, clinicians must balance the utilitarian goal of preserving the effectiveness of antibiotics with ethical obligations to patients who nowadays with weather condition that are unlikely to be harmed and may benefit from antibiotic utilize. There is also considerable contend in veterinary medicine regarding employ of antibiotics in animals raised for man consumption (nutrient animals). The potential threat to human health resulting from inappropriate antibiotic use in nutrient animals is significant, every bit pathogenic-resistant organisms propagated in these livestock are poised to enter the nutrient supply and could be widely disseminated in food products.10 – xv Commensal leaner plant in livestock are frequently nowadays in fresh meat products and may serve equally reservoirs for resistant genes that could potentially be transferred to pathogenic organisms in humans.xvi , 17
While antibiotic use in food animals may represent a risk to human health, the degree and relative impact have not been well characterized. Given divergent stakeholder interests and inadequate enquiry to date, public policy discussions of this result are often contentious and highly polarized. The aim of this review is to examine the scope and nature of antibody employ in food animals and summarize its potential impact on human health. Nosotros as well review key national and international policies on employ of antibiotics in food animals. Finally, nosotros propose future directions for enquiry and monitoring of the agricultural employ of antibiotics.
METHODS
We searched 3 online databases of medical and scientific literature citations—the National Library of Medicine'south MEDLINE®, the U.S. Section of Agriculture's National Agricultural Library Itemize (known as AGRICOLA), and Thomson Reuter's Spider web of Science—for English-language documents from 1994–2009 containing the keywords "antibiotic," "antibody resistance," "antimicrobial," "antimicrobial resistance," "agronomics," "livestock," "food animal," "farm creature," "squealer," "swine," "cattle," "cow," "poultry," and "chicken." Two authors reviewed the references and selected exemplary original inquiry manufactures examining the association between antibiotic use in nutrient animals and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in humans. We too performed searches of the ROAR Commensal Literature Database (part of the Reservoirs of Antibody Resistance [ROAR] projection, coordinated by the Alliance for Prudent Use of Antibiotics and funded by a grant from the National Found of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and the World Wellness System (WHO) website to place inquiry articles and policy documents pertaining to antibiotic use in food animals. An online search engine was used to locate policy statements published by governmental agencies.
RESULTS
In our review, we plant that the utilise of antibiotics in nutrient animals is widespread, yet poorly characterized. Furthermore, in existing studies, neither the risks to human wellness nor the benefits to animal production take been well studied. We as well institute a lack of consistency in national and international policies.
In the post-obit sections, we review the current literature on the nature and scope of antibiotic employ in food animals, and on the epidemiologic links between employ of antibiotics in food animals and resistance in humans. We then provide an overview of the complex risk analysis framework required to sympathise this trouble. Finally, we review key national and international policy and regulatory recommendations.
Literature on the nature and scope of antibiotic apply in food animals
The loftier population density of modernistic intensively managed livestock operations results in sharing of both commensal flora and pathogens, which tin can be conducive to rapid dissemination of infectious agents. As a result, livestock in these environments usually require aggressive infection management strategies, which often include the use of antibiotic therapy.
Antibiotics are used in food animals to treat clinical disease, to prevent and control common disease events, and to enhance animate being growth.18 The different applications of antibiotics in nutrient animals have been described as therapeutic utilise, safety use, and subtherapeutic apply. Antibiotics can be used to treat a unmarried fauna with clinical illness or a big group of animals. However, these various uses are frequently indistinct; definitions of each type of use vary, and the approaches are oftentimes applied meantime in livestock populations.19 For example, sixteen% of all lactating dairy cows in the U.S. receive antibody therapy for clinical mastitis each year, just nearly all dairy cows receive intramammary infusions of prophylactic doses of antibiotics post-obit each lactation to prevent and control future mastitis—primarily with penicillins, cephalosporins, or other beta-lactam drugs.twenty Similarly, xv% of beef calves that enter feedlots receive antibiotics for the treatment of clinical respiratory disease, simply therapeutic antibiotic doses are also administered to x% of evidently healthy calves to mitigate anticipated outbreaks of respiratory disease.21 Forty-two percent of beef calves in feedlots are fed tylosin—a veterinary macrolide drug—to prevent liver abscesses that negatively touch growth, and approximately 88% of growing swine in the U.South. receive antibiotics in their feed for affliction prevention and growth promotion purposes, normally tetracyclines or tylosin.22 Most antibody use in livestock requires a veterinarian prescription, although individual handling decisions are often made and administered by lay subcontract workers in accordance with guidelines provided by a veterinarian.23 , 24
Despite the widespread adoption of antibiotic use in food animals, reliable data about the quantity and patterns of use (e.g., dose and frequency) are non available.25 Quantifying antibiotic utilise in nutrient animals is challenging due to variations in study objectives—investigators may measure just therapeutic uses, only nontherapeutic uses, or a combination thereof, depending on their event of interest—and lack of clarity surrounding the definitions of therapeutic vs. nontherapeutic uses.26 Although limited, the available information advise that nutrient animal product is responsible for a significant proportion of antibiotic use. In 1989, the Institute of Medicine estimated that approximately half of the 31.nine one thousand thousand pounds of antimicrobials consumed in the U.South. were for nontherapeutic use in animals.27 More recent estimates by the Matrimony of Concerned Scientists, an advocacy grouping that supports reduced agricultural antimicrobial use, suggest that 24.6 1000000 pounds of antimicrobials are used for nontherapeutic purposes in chickens, cattle, and swine, compared with merely 3.0 meg pounds used for human being medicine. Calculations by the pharmaceutical industry-sponsored Animal Health Found are more bourgeois, suggesting that of 17.8 million pounds of antimicrobials used for animals, only 3.1 one thousand thousand pounds are used nontherapeutically.26 Twelve classes of antimicrobials—arsenicals, polypeptides, glycolipids, tetracyclines, elfamycins, macrolides, lincosamides, polyethers, beta-lactams, quinoxalines, streptogramins, and sulfonamides—may be used at dissimilar times in the life cycle of poultry, cattle, and swine.25 While some of the antimicrobials used in animals are not currently used to care for human disease, many, such as tetracyclines, penicillins, and sulfonamides, are also used in the treatment of infections in humans.26 The WHO has developed criteria for the nomenclature of antibiotics every bit "critically important," "highly of import," and "important" based on their importance in the handling of human disease.28 , 29
However, other classes of antimicrobials used in agronomics accept not led to concerns well-nigh dissemination of resistance in humans. For example, some of the well-nigh oftentimes used antibiotics in ruminants are ionophores, a distinctive class of antibiotics that alter intestinal flora to achieve increased energy and amino acid availability and improved nutrient utilization. Nigh beefiness calves in feedlots and some dairy heifers receive this drug routinely in their feed. Because of their specific mode of action, ionophores have never been used in humans or therapeutically in animals. While some leaner are intrinsically resistant to these drugs, there is currently no show to suggest that ionophore resistance is transferable or that co-selection for resistance to other classes of antimicrobials occurs.xxx
Literature suggesting epidemiologic evidence of an association between antibiotic utilize in food animals and antibiotic resistance in humans
Bear witness that antibiotic use in food animals can result in antibiotic-resistant infections in humans has existed for several decades. Associations between antibody use in food animals and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from those animals have been detected in observational studies as well as in randomized trials. Antibody-resistant bacteria of animal origin accept been observed in the environment surrounding livestock farming operations, on meat products available for buy in retail food stores, and as the cause of clinical infections and subclinical colonization in humans. Effigy 1 outlines a sampling of prevalence studies, outbreak investigations, ecological studies, case-control studies, and randomized trials whose results suggest a potential relationship between antibiotic employ in nutrient animals and antibiotic resistance in humans.
Literature on the risks and benefits of antibiotic use in food animals
To understand how antibiotic use in agriculture might impact the emergence of antibiotic resistance, information technology is essential to consider the complex interaction of elements in the physical environment (e.g., air, soil, and water) with social exchanges (eastward.thousand., between animals within a herd, farmers and animals, and domestic poultry and migratory birds), in processing steps (eastward.m., farming activities, transportation, and storage), and in human use patterns (e.yard., nutrient grooming, meat consumption, and susceptibility to infection) (Figure 2). Antibody employ in animals can have direct and indirect effects on human health: direct effects are those that can exist causally linked to contact with antibiotic-resistant leaner from food animals, and indirect effects are those that event from contact with resistant organisms that have been spread to various components of the ecosystem (e.g., water and soil) equally a outcome of antibiotic use in food animals (Figure 3).
Figure iii.
Examples of directly and indirect effects of antibiotic employ in food animals on human being health
Given the multitude of factors that contribute to the pathways past which antibiotic use in food animals could pose risks to human health, it is not surprising that a wide variety of methods has been used by researchers in diverse disciplines to approach the problem. In full general, adventure assessment models in veterinary medicine emphasize animal wellness and treatment of diseases in animals, food scientists' studies focus on the prophylactic of human food supplies and the presence of antibody-resistant bacteria on nutrient products, clinicians and epidemiologists investigate man outbreaks caused by resistant infections for which animals are identified as main sources, and molecular biologists examine relationships betwixt resistant strains and the prevalence of specific resistance genes in human and creature bacteria. Information technology is unlikely that any single report will be able to fully and accurately quantify the human relationship betwixt antibiotic use in food animals and infections in humans. At best, just crude estimates of the etiologic fraction or "touch on fraction" can be made for specific links in the ecologic chain.31
Several mathematical models accept been proposed to quantify the overall run a risk associated with antibiotic use in animals, typically by estimating the prevalence of infection with a specific organism and its associated morbidity, and then multiplying by the proportion of these infections believed to be attributable to antibiotic employ in food animals. While models of this nature have been rightfully criticized for failing to include indirect risk and, consequently, underestimating total potential risk, felicitous risk assessment strategies must also consider the potential benefits of antibiotic use in food animals. Even though agricultural antibiotic use carries a demonstrated take chances, there are likely benefits to the agricultural employ of antibiotics every bit well. For case, reducing animal microbial load and shedding could pb to safer, more affordable food. All the same, many of the claims of do good have not been fully demonstrated in large-scale trials, and other trials have shown that the overall touch of the brusk-term benefit is poorly described.
The U.S. Food and Drug Assistants (FDA) requires manufacturers of new antibiotics to perform risk assessments to demonstrate that new drugs are safe and constructive for use in animals and that "there is reasonable certainty of no harm to human health from the proposed utilise of the drug in nutrient-producing animals."32 To evaluate potential homo health consequences, the FDA employs a qualitative framework to classify every bit "low," "medium," or "loftier" the probabilities that leaner in the brute population will acquire resistance, that humans volition ingest the resistant leaner in food products, and that ingesting the leaner will result in adverse wellness outcomes (Figure 4). Drug approval decisions are based on these risk estimations, forth with information nigh proposed marketing status (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or veterinary feed additives), extent of limitations on extra-label utilise, and intended use patterns (eastward.g., duration of utilize and administration to individual animals vs. select groups of animals vs. flocks or herds of animals). "High-risk" drugs may be approved if the FDA determines that homo wellness risk can be mitigated. "Medium-risk" drugs could be canonical if advisable label restrictions are required.
In improver to the direct risk assessment model, the FDA has adult guidance to make up one's mind the risk of antibody residues remaining on food products.32 This guidance recommends determining the impact of antibiotic residues on normal human abdominal flora and the presence of resistance in these strains, and it provides guidelines for the calculation of Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for antibiotic residues that pose an appreciable risk to human being health.
Guidelines and recommendations on the use of antibiotics in nutrient animals
Given the importance of antibody resistance as a public health trouble, many governments and professional person societies take reviewed existing scientific evidence and adult recommendations to limit all types of antibiotic apply, including employ in food animals. Depending on the nature and jurisdiction of each group, the findings may provide best do guidelines for antibiotic use, prioritized agendas for research on the emergence of antibiotic resistance, recommendations for legislative activity to regulate drug approval and surveillance processes, or enforceable laws on the manufacture, distribution, and prescription of antibiotics. Effigy 5 summarizes recommendations directly related to use of antibiotics in nutrient animal production for a sample of national and international guidance and policy documents.
Word
Despite increasingly widespread recognition that antibiotic utilize in food animals is an important contributor to human infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Figure 1), there remains a meaning need for scientific bear witness of the antibody employ practices that create the greatest man health risk. Our goal with this article was not to suggest specific solutions to the problem—in part because nosotros believe there are no easy, specific answers—but rather to reiterate and summarize the importance of this issue and to advise some general policy directions that are indicated. As the importance of the trouble and complexity of the issues are increasingly appreciated by the public, policy dialogue, focused research, and informed regulatory activeness tin be undertaken. To facilitate further enquiry and timely activeness in response to emerging knowledge on this upshot, we advise the post-obit measures, which are in concert with WHO's global strategy for the containment of antimicrobial resistance, the U.South. Interagency Task Force on Antibiotic Resistance's public health activity plan to gainsay antimicrobial resistance, and the Infectious Diseases Social club of America'southward call to activity.33 – 35
Develop a scientific agenda to recommend advisable written report designs and specific aims related to antimicrobial utilise in food animals
A coordinated plan is needed to identify missing scientific data and to specify research designs and methods to address these needs. Although rigorous studies accept been conducted in some disciplines, there has been a lack of serious and harmonized interdisciplinary effort to aggrandize on the corpus of knowledge, which should exist used to inform public policy. To result in a useful and complete list of enquiry priorities, the agenda must include contributions past experts in basic sciences (due east.m., genetics and microbiology), clinical sciences (e.g., veterinarian medicine and human being medicine), public health (e.1000., epidemiology and nursing), social sciences (e.g., anthropology and folklore), economic science (east.g., wellness and agronomics), and public policy (e.m., legislative and regulatory). Research goals put along in the agenda should be reflective of methodological weaknesses identified in the existing literature. For example, definitions of antibody uses in food animals (due east.g., therapeutic and subtherapeutic) should exist standardized and designed to reverberate specific goals (due east.chiliad., improving production or preventing economic loss from unrestrained disease); the terms should be recognized beyond disciplines and used to classify the potential furnishings of dissimilar types of antibiotic use on man wellness. Another potential focus could exist whether to approach research on the development of resistance narrowly (i.eastward., the causes and effects of specific drug-organism combinations) or broadly (i.e., the causes and effects of all antibiotics used in animals on microbial flora) to develop public health recommendations.
Fund agricultural enquiry that reflects the priorities identified by the research agenda
Inadequate funding for agricultural research has likely contributed to the lack of sufficient scientific prove necessary for informing public wellness decisions. For instance, in the Usa, it was recently estimated that the $101 billion in combined governmental and biomedical industry research funding represents well-nigh 5% of national health expenditures each year.36 In 2007, the U.S. Department of Agriculture provided more than $32 million in external inquiry funding, representing less than i one-thousandth of i% of almanac U.S. livestock and poultry sales.37 In contrast, one unmarried Constitute within the National Institutes of Health—the National Found of Allergy and Infectious Diseases—directed more 20 times this amount to antimicrobial resistance enquiry (more than $800 million) in the aforementioned twelvemonth.38 Given the calibration of the antibiotic resistance problem and the demonstrated role of agricultural antibiotic uses in this impending public health crisis, adequate support for enquiry specific to the part of agricultural uses of antibiotics in the development of resistance must exist a national priority. Because that the U.S. funds 70% to 80% of biomedical inquiry worldwide, the need for advisable levels of funding is particularly acute.36
Urgently accost barriers to the collection and analysis of antimicrobial use data
Complex political, economic, and social barriers limit the quality of data on the employ of antibiotics in food animals. Currently, such information are provided on a voluntary footing, and the methods used to collect and compile reports are non standardized or fully transparent. While voluntary industry compliance with antibiotic reporting is laudable, the long-term effectiveness of nonbinding auditing programs is unproven. Effective surveillance of veterinary antimicrobial product and assistants to food animals is a primal showtime step toward ascertaining realistic estimates of the total telescopic of antibiotic use. These data will be useless, however, unless an agency with adequate analytic, regulatory, and enforcement capabilities exists. Because the commercial interests of antibiotic manufacturers must exist appropriately counterbalanced with the public health urgency for development of new antibiotics, any agency tasked with monitoring antibody resistance must operate independently of commercial influences when releasing data to the public and drafting testify-based regulations to safeguard man health.
Conclusion
Information technology is axiomatic that at nowadays, the resources devoted to studying the function of antibody use in nutrient animals—both in terms of funding and scientific inquiry—are insufficient. It is now disquisitional that agricultural use of antibiotics exist recognized every bit one of the major contributors to the development of resistant organisms that result in life-threatening human infections and included equally part of the strategy to control the mounting public health crisis of antibiotic resistance.
Footnotes
During portions of this project, Dr. Landers was supported past a training grant from the National Found of Nursing Inquiry, National Institutes of Health (Preparation in Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance; T90 NR010824).
REFERENCES
ane. Boyce JM. Customs-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus every bit a cause of health care-associated infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:795–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Popovich KJ, Weinstein RA. The graying of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Command Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:9–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Aminov RI, Mackie RI. Evolution and ecology of antibody resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;271:147–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
iv. Courvalin P. Predictable and unpredictable evolution of antibiotic resistance. J Intern Med. 2008;264:4–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
v. Spellberg B, Powers JH, Brass EP, Miller LG, Edwards JE., Jr Trends in antimicrobial drug development: implications for the future. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1279–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Talbot GH, Bradley J, Edwards JE, Jr, Gilbert D, Scheld M, Bartlett JG. Bad bugs demand drugs: an update on the evolution pipeline from the Antimicrobial Availability Job Forcefulness of the Infectious Diseases Order of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:657–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Norrby SR, Nord CE, Finch R European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Lack of evolution of new antimicrobial drugs: a potential serious threat to public health. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:115–nine. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
eight. Avorn JL, Barrett JF, Davey PG, McEwen SA, O'Brien TF, Levy SB. Geneva: World Health Arrangement; 2001. [cited 2010 November 10]. Antibiotic resistance: synthesis of recommendations by expert policy groups. Also bachelor from: URL: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_CDS_CSR_DRS_2001.x.pdf. [Google Scholar]
nine. Belongia EA, Knobloch MJ, Kieke BA, Davis JP, Janette C, Besser RE. Touch of statewide program to promote advisable antimicrobial drug apply. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:912–xx. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ten. Garofalo C, Vignaroli C, Zandri G, Aquilanti L, Bordoni D, Osimani A, et al. Directly detection of antibody resistance genes in specimens of chicken and pork meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;113:75–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
eleven. Cui Southward, Ge B, Zheng J, Meng J. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella serovars in organic chickens from Maryland retail stores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4108–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Gundogan N, Citak S, Yucel N, Devren A. A note on the incidence and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat and chicken samples. Meat Sci. 2005;69:807–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Kim SH, Wei CI, Tzou YM, An H. Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from farm environments and retail products in Oklahoma. J Food Prot. 2005;68:2022–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xiv. Parveen S, Taabodi M, Schwarz JG, Oscar TP, Harter-Dennis J, White DG. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella recovered from processed poultry. J Food Prot. 2007;70:2466–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
fifteen. Ramchandani M, Manges AR, DebRoy C, Smith SP, Johnson JR, Riley LW. Possible beast origin of human-associated multidrug-resistant, uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:251–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Mena C, Rodrigues D, Silva J, Gibbs P, Teixeira P. Occurrence, identification, and characterization of Campylobacter species isolated from Portuguese poultry samples collected from retail establishments. Poult Sci. 2008;87:187–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Diarrassouba F, Diarra MS, Bach Southward, Delaquis P, Pritchard J, Topp E, et al. Antibiotic resistance and virulence genes in commensal Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates from commercial broiler craven farms. J Food Prot. 2007;seventy:1316–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xviii. McEwen SA, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(Suppl 3):S93–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Establish of Medicine; National Research Council; Console on Beast Health, Food Safety and Public Health; Committee on Drug Use in Food Animals. Washington: National Academy Press; 1999. The apply of drugs in food animals: benefits and risks. [Google Scholar]
xx. Department of Agriculture (US) Fort Collins (CO): USDA, Brute and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Animate being Wellness Monitoring System; 2008. Sep, [cited 2010 Nov eleven]. Dairy 2007 part Iii: reference of dairy cattle health and management practices in the United States, 2007. Besides available from: URL: http://world wide web.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_dr_PartIII_rev.pdf. [Google Scholar]
22. Section of Agronomics (US) Fort Collins (CO): USDA, Animate being and Plant Wellness Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Creature Health Monitoring Organisation; 2008. Mar, [cited 2011 Sep 12]. Swine 2006 office Three: reference of swine health, productivity, and general management in the United States, 2006. Also bachelor from: URL: http://world wide web.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/swine/downloads/swine2006/Swine2006_dr_PartIII.pdf. [Google Scholar]
23. Raymond MJ, Wohrle RD, Call DR. Cess and promotion of judicious antibiotic use on dairy farms in Washington State. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89:3228–twoscore. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Sawant AA, Sordillo LM, Jayaro BM. A survey on antibiotic usage in dairy herds in Pennsylvania. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:2991–nine. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall AB. A global perspective on the employ, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere. 2006;65:725–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Constitute of Medicine. Washington: National University Press; 1989. Human being health risks with the subtherapeutic use of penicillin or tetracyclines in animal feed. [Google Scholar]
28. World Wellness Organization. Critically important antimicrobials for human being medicine: categorization for the development of gamble management strategies to comprise antimicrobial resistance due to non-human antimicrobial use. Written report of the 2nd WHO Proficient Meeting; 29-31 May 2007; Copenhagen. [cited 2010 Nov 11]. Bachelor from: URL: http://www.who.int/foodborne_disease/resistance/antimicrobials_human.pdf. [Google Scholar]
29. Collingnon P, Powers JH, Chiller TM, Aidara-Kane A, Aarestrup FM. World Health Organisation ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: a disquisitional step for developing risk management strategies for the employ of antimicrobials in food production animals. Clin Infec Dis. 2009;49:132–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Callaway TR, Edrington TS, Rychlik JL, Genovese KJ, Poole TL, Jung YS, et al. Ionophores: their employ every bit ruminant growth promotants and bear on on food condom. Curr Problems Intest Microbiol. 2003;4:43–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Greenland Due south, Rothman KJ, Lash TL. Measures of issue and measures of association. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Mod epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. pp. 51–70. [Google Scholar]
32. Department of Wellness and Human Services (U.s.a.), Nutrient and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine. Guidance for industry #152: evaluating the safety of antimicrobial new animal drugs with regard to their microbiological furnishings on leaner of human being health business concern. 2003. Oct 23, [cited 2010 Nov 11]. Available from: URL: http://world wide web.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/-GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM052519.pdf.
33. World Health System. WHO global principles for the containment of antimicrobial resistance in animals intended for food: report of a WHO consultation with the participation of the Food and Agriculture Arrangement of the Un and the Role International des Epizooties, 5–ix Jun 2000, Geneva. [cited 2010 Nov 11]. Available from: URL: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2000/who_cds_csr_aph_2000.4.pdf.
34. Interagency Task Strength on Antimicrobial Resistance (Us) Atlanta: Centers for Disease Command and Prevention (U.s.), Nutrient and Drug Administration (U.s.), National Institutes of Health; 2008. Jun, [cited 2010 Nov eleven]. A public health action plan to combat antimicrobial resistance: function 1: domestic issues. Also available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/actionplan/aractionplan.pdf. [Google Scholar]
35. Spellberg B, Guidos R, Gilbert D, Bradley J, Boucher HW, Scheld WM, et al. The epidemic of antibiotic-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:155–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Dorsey ER, de Roulet J, Thompson JP, Reminick JI, Thai A, White-Stellato Z, et al. Funding of US biomedical research, 2003–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:137–43. [PMC complimentary commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Roberts RM, Smith GW, Bazer FW, Cibelli J, Seidel GE, Jr, Bauman DE, et al. Research priorities: farm fauna inquiry in crisis. Science. 2009;324:468–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Peters NK, Dixon DM, Holland SM, Fauci AS. The research calendar of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for antimicrobial resistance. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1087–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234384/
Posted by: johnsonsniters.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Are Some Of The Issues Associated With Antibiotics In Animal Feed"
Post a Comment